.think

Is .think a real TLD? Who’s applying to run it?

Nobody has applied for .think in its own right, as of 7 October 2026. Intercap named .think as a backup string for its .mind application. ICANN deactivated it, because another applicant applied for the same string or named it as a backup. Link Freedom Group named .think as a backup string for its .thing application. ICANN deactivated it, because another applicant applied for the same string or named it as a backup.

Culture · on the record since Aug 15, 2026, updated Oct 7, 2026
applicants
0 applications · 2 deactivated backups

Nobody has applied for .think in its own right.

backups
  • Link Freedom GroupDeactivated backuplfg.link ↗Aug 13, 2026

    In LFG's published list of 300+ strings submitted before the ICANN window closed on 2026-08-12. Their catalog tagline: “Minds in motion.”

    announced Aug 13, 2026 · abandoned Oct 7, 2026 · named as a backup for .thing, deactivated by ICANN Oct 7, 2026

    Deactivated backup for .thingGenericICANN LFGL2683T-T87687Link Freedom Group ↗
  • IntercapDeactivated backupintercap.inc ↗

    Named on the ICANN gTLD application list, 7 October 2026 as a replacement (backup) string of the applicant's .mind application, shown as deactivated: another applicant applied for the same string or named it as a backup

    Deactivated backup for .mindGenericICANN IRI2679T-T33645ICANN ↗

Will names sell?

◈AI score
40/ 100
Usable but limited

A catchy verb for idea brands, think tanks, and campaigns; memorable, but rarely a serious project's primary web address.

assessed by claude-fable-5 · Aug 15, 2026

Last round the AI scored the 2012 strings blind to their fate. Strings it scored 60 or more hold a median 27,168 names today; those under 30, a median of 30. .think’s closest 2012 strings hold .talk 1K, .read 2 and .how 4K.

AI score 40 of 100. .com scores 96, .ai scores 84.

For comparison, .com scores 96 and .ai scores 84 on the same rubric.

How the AI’s blind 2012 read held up: its score of each 2012 string against the names it holds today808 2012-round TLDs. Scored 60 or more: median 27168 names. Scored under 30: median 30 names. .think's closest 2012 strings: .talk scored 35, 1425 names; .read scored 30, 2 names; .how scored 15, 3596 names.101001K10K100K1M020406080100scored 60+: median 27Kunder 30: median 30.talk · 35 · 1K.read · 30 · 2.how · 15 · 4Kthe AI’s blind 2012 score of each string (its own scale) →names held today (log) →

a 2012-round TLD.think’s closest 2012 strings: score · names

The 2012 read is a separate, time-locked score on its own scale, so .think’s score above is not placed on it. Names: the registries’ reports to ICANN, 2026-10. Non-brand 2012 TLDs in the root.

closest 2012 strings
3 of 1,408

The nearest 2012 strings, and how many names each holds today

The closest 2012 string, .talk, held 1,425 names, June 2026. .read held 2; .how held 3,596. Chosen by AI from every string in the 2012 round, without being told what happened to any of them.

  1. .talkstrong parallel1,425 names, June 2026live since 2016 · 2 applications in 2012 · scored 35* in 2012 · Amazon EU S.à r.l.See .talk in Stats

    Same bet: a bare English verb for a mental/verbal act with no industry that owns it, so its whole value rests on registrants completing a phrase after the dot rather than on any pre-existing category of buyer.

  2. .readstrong parallel2 names, June 2026live since 2015 · uncontested in 2012 · scored 30* in 2012 · Amazon EU S.à r.l.See .read in Stats

    Another single cognitive-action verb with no natural registrant class, sold on aspirational wordplay and likely defended as a brand-adjacent halo string rather than as an open market of businesses that call themselves that.

  3. .howmoderate3,596 names, June 2026live since 2014 · uncontested in 2012 · scored 15* in 2012 · Charleston Road Registry Inc.See .how in Stats

    Same abstract-function-word bet — meaningless alone, valuable only if people build sentence-style names on it — though it leans more toward instructional utility than .think's identity-of-ideas positioning.

Names are from the registries’ monthly reports to ICANN. Each name opens the TLD’s stats page: how it grew, who sells it, and the 2026 strings compared with it. * A separate 2012-only read, time-locked to what was public that year, on a different scale from this page’s score.

who it’s for

consultancies, think tanks, coaches, media and education brands built around ideas, plus AI and product startups wanting an evocative campaign or slogan-style domain

What a .think domain is

.think is not a TLD yet. It is a string on our record of the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round, in our Culture category. Nobody has applied for .think in its own right. It is named on ICANN’s list as part of an application for another string.

Is the .think domain extension real yet?

.think is not yet a domain extension you can register: nothing resolves under it, and no registrar sells names in it. Nobody has applied for it on the public record; the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round is the process that would decide whether it becomes one.

When can you buy a .think domain?

You can’t yet. A .think name can only be registered once the string is delegated (added to the DNS root) and its registry opens. Last round's closest parallel to .think was .talk, delegated on 25 March 2016.

Is .think a real TLD?

Not yet. .think is not in the DNS root, so nothing resolves under it. It’s here because ICANN’s list names .think as part of an application for another string. Every entry on this page links to its source.

Considering a name on .think?Appraise a name on this TLD →

This record is corrected in the open. See the changelog and methodology.