.well

Is .well a real TLD? Who’s applying to run it?

.well is contested: 4 applications for it are on ICANN’s Reveal Day list, as of 7 October 2026. They are Identity Digital, XYZ Registry, Intercap and Link Freedom Group. GoDaddy Registry named .well as a backup string for its .zen application. ICANN deactivated it, because another applicant applied for the same string or named it as a backup. .top (Zhongze) named .well as a backup string for its .move application. ICANN deactivated it, because another applicant applied for the same string or named it as a backup.

Generic applications · Culture · on the record since Aug 15, 2026, updated Oct 7, 2026
applicants
4 applications · 2 deactivated backups

Who is applying, and what they run today

Three of the four already run TLDs, 26.77M names between them. One runs one of .well's closest 2012 strings: Identity Digital .care. Link Freedom Group runs none.

  • Hair Apparent, LLC

    Identity Digital

    controlled by Ethos Capital Digital Infrastructure UGP LLC

    277 TLDs · 14.80M names: .info 5.63M, .pro 1.25M, .live 672K, .care 48K (2012 comp)

    backup .nft, disallowed

  • XYZ.COM LLC

    XYZ Registry

    controlled by Daniel Negari, Michael Ambrose

    35 TLDs · 11.96M names: .xyz 9.15M, .lol 1.13M, .autos 290K

    backup .wear, disallowed

  • Intercap Registry Inc.

    Intercap

    controlled by Jason Adam Chapnik

    4 TLDs · 11K names: .inc 8K, .box 3K, .dealer 222

    backup .grow, disallowed

  • Link Freedom Group Ltd

    Link Freedom Group

    controlled by Vandelay Investments Ltd, Yonatan Belousov

    runs no TLD today

    backup .will

runs TLDs today; the larger, the more namesruns none.tld in orange: one of this string’s closest 2012 stringsbackup .x usable · backup .x ✕ disallowed

Applications are counted by company, across its legal entities, from ICANN’s list. Names are from the registries’ June 2026 reports to ICANN. “None on record” means no public source in our record ties the company to a registry operator that runs TLDs today. Control: each application’s own answer to ICANN (question 108). Largest TLDs and names: the registries’ monthly reports to ICANN.

backups
  • .top (Zhongze)Deactivated backupnic.top ↗

    Named on the ICANN gTLD application list, 7 October 2026 as a replacement (backup) string of the applicant's .move application, shown as deactivated: another applicant applied for the same string or named it as a backup

    Deactivated backup for .moveGenericICANN HKZI2636T-T95610ICANN ↗
  • Named on the ICANN gTLD application list, 7 October 2026 as a replacement (backup) string of the applicant's .zen application, shown as deactivated: another applicant applied for the same string or named it as a backup

    Deactivated backup for .zenGenericICANN NA2631T-T43068ICANN ↗

Will names sell?

◈AI score
44/ 100
Usable but limited

A friendly wellness-word ending that makes clever marketing names, but most serious brands will keep it as a sidekick, not their main address.

assessed by claude-fable-5 · Aug 15, 2026

Last round the AI scored the 2012 strings blind to their fate. Strings it scored 60 or more hold a median 27,168 names today; those under 30, a median of 30. .well’s closest 2012 strings hold .fit 81K, .health 61K and .care 48K.

AI score 44 of 100. .com scores 96, .ai scores 84.

For comparison, .com scores 96 and .ai scores 84 on the same rubric.

How the AI’s blind 2012 read held up: its score of each 2012 string against the names it holds today808 2012-round TLDs. Scored 60 or more: median 27168 names. Scored under 30: median 30 names. .well's closest 2012 strings: .fit scored 45, 81056 names; .health scored 60, 61435 names; .care scored 45, 47784 names.101001K10K100K1M020406080100scored 60+: median 27Kunder 30: median 30.fit · 45 · 81K.health · 60 · 61K.care · 45 · 48Kthe AI’s blind 2012 score of each string (its own scale) →names held today (log) →

a 2012-round TLD.well’s closest 2012 strings: score · names

The 2012 read is a separate, time-locked score on its own scale, so .well’s score above is not placed on it. Names: the registries’ reports to ICANN, 2026-10. Non-brand 2012 TLDs in the root.

closest 2012 strings
3 of 1,408

The nearest 2012 strings, and how many names each holds today

The closest 2012 string, .fit, held 81,056 names, June 2026. .health held 61,435; .care held 47,784. Chosen by AI from every string in the 2012 round, without being told what happened to any of them.

  1. .fitstrong parallel81,056 names, June 2026live since 2015 · 2 applications in 2012 · scored 45* in 2012 · Minds + Machines Group LimitedSee .fit in Stats

    Same bet: a very short, everyday English word whose ordinary meaning is soft and adverbial rather than a hard category, sold as a wellness-flavored identity that any coach, studio, app or supplement brand can bend to fit, so it lives or dies on evocative branding rather than on being the obvious noun for an industry.

  2. .healthmoderate61,435 names, June 2026live since 2016 · 4 applications in 2012 · scored 60* in 2012 · DotHealth, LLCSee .health in Stats

    Same buyer and same wellness-authority job — practitioners, clinics and consumer health brands putting their primary identity on the string — but it is the definitional category noun where the target is a vaguer, more lifestyle-toned word, so it carries more inherent credibility and more regulatory/trust baggage than the target's bet does.

  3. .caremoderate47,784 names, June 2026live since 2014 · uncontested in 2012 · scored 45* in 2012 · Goose CrossSee .care in Stats

    Same bet on a tiny, warm, semantically loose common word that reads as a promise rather than a category, monetized across health, wellness and services buyers who use it as the second half of a phrase-domain rather than as a directory of an industry.

Names are from the registries’ monthly reports to ICANN. Each name opens the TLD’s stats page: how it grew, who sells it, and the 2026 strings compared with it. * A separate 2012-only read, time-locked to what was public that year, on a different scale from this page’s score.

Where they meet elsewhere

Identity Digital and XYZ Registry face each other in 77 contests this round, .well included.

  • Identity Digital × XYZ Registry
    77
  • Identity Digital × Link Freedom Group
    68
  • Identity Digital × GoDaddy Registry
    51
  • Link Freedom Group × XYZ Registry
    49
  • Identity Digital × Intercap
    34

Shared contests: strings where both companies hold an application on ICANN’s list. Companies that meet another here in fewer than three are left out.

who it’s for

wellness, self-care, and lifestyle brands (spas, supplements, fitness apps, coaching, hospitality) plus marketers wanting verb-plus-well wordplay names like sleep.well or eat.well as campaign or redirect domains.

What a .well domain is

.well is not a TLD yet. It is a string on our record of the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round, in our Culture category. 4 applications for it are on ICANN’s Reveal Day list.

Is the .well domain extension real yet?

.well is not yet a domain extension you can register: nothing resolves under it, and no registrar sells names in it. It is a string applicants have put forward in the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round, the process that decides whether it becomes one.

When can you buy a .well domain?

You can’t yet. A .well name can only be registered once the string is delegated (added to the DNS root) and its registry opens. Last round's closest parallel to .well was .fit, delegated on 9 January 2015.

Is .well a real TLD?

Not yet. .well is not in the DNS root, so nothing resolves under it. It’s here because .well is on ICANN’s Reveal Day list of applied-for strings. Every entry on this page links to its source.

Considering a name on .well?Appraise a name on this TLD →

This record is corrected in the open. See the changelog and methodology.