.sns

Is .sns a real TLD? Who’s applying to run it?

.sns is not contested. One application for it is on ICANN’s Reveal Day list, as of 7 October 2026. It is XServer.

AI & tech
on the record since Oct 7, 2026 · updated Oct 7, 2026
◈AI score
34/ 100
Usable but limited

A short, meaningful string for social-media businesses in East Asia, but most will still pick .com or a local domain first.

assessed by claude-fable-5-1 · Oct 7, 2026
AI score 34 of 100. .com scores 96, .ai scores 84.
who it’s for

social-media marketing agencies, creators, community apps and SNS-tool vendors, mainly in markets where "SNS" is the everyday word for social media

techCultureCommerce
applicants
1 application
XServerConfirmed

Applied as XRegistry Incorporated · xserver.co.jp ↗

confirmed by ICANN Oct 7, 2026 · deactivated backup .zzz

GenericICANN XI2694T-T84425ICANN ↗
closest 2012 bets
3 of 1,408

The 2012 applications making the most similar bet. Chosen by AI from every string in that round, without being told what happened to any of them.

.socialstrong parallel
delegated 2014 · live49,879 domains · May 2026

Same bet exactly — own the generic label for the social-networking service category and rent primary identity to platforms, communities and people's public profiles; the only difference is that one spells the category out and the other uses the initialism the same category is known by in East Asian markets.

uncontested · scored 62* in 2012 · run by United TLD Holdco Ltd.

See .social in Stats
.chatmoderate
delegated 2015 · live57,840 domains · May 2026

Also a plain generic for a consumer online-communication service category sold as identity to apps and communities rather than to one company, so it needs the same thing to be true — that people accept a service-category word as the place their social presence lives — but it is a word everyone decodes rather than a trade initialism.

4 applicants contested it · scored 62* in 2012 · run by Sand Fields, LLC

See .chat in Stats
.ottmoderate
delegated 2016 · live4 domains · May 2026

The nearest 2012 case of the same word-kind bet: a three-letter industry initialism for an emerging internet-service category, legible to the trade and opaque to consumers, wagered on becoming the namespace that category's operators put their identity on.

uncontested · scored 15* in 2012 · run by Dish DBS Corporation

See .ott in Stats

* A separate 2012-only read, time-locked to what was public that year. Different scale from this page’s score, so the two are not comparable.

What a .sns domain is

.sns is not a TLD yet. It is a string on our record of the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round, filed under AI & tech. One application for it is on ICANN’s Reveal Day list.

Is the .sns domain extension real yet?

.sns is not yet a domain extension you can register: nothing resolves under it, and no registrar sells names in it. It is a string applicants have put forward in the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round, the process that decides whether it becomes one.

When can you buy a .sns domain?

You can’t yet. ICANN publishes every applied-for string on Reveal Day, 7 October 2026 at 18:00 UTC. A .sns name can only be registered after that, once the string is delegated and its registry opens. Last round's closest parallel to .sns was .social, delegated on 14 January 2014.

Is .sns a real TLD?

Not yet. .sns is not in the DNS root, so nothing resolves under it. It’s here because .sns is on ICANN’s Reveal Day list of applied-for strings. Every entry on this page links to its source.

history
  1. XServer · first recordedOct 7, 2026
    ICANN
news & sources
ICANNICANN Reveal Day list, 7 October 2026
Oct 7, 2026
“XI2694T-T84425 · XRegistry Incorporated · primary”
ICANN
about XServer
ICANNICANN gTLD application list, 7 October 2026
Oct 7, 2026
“ASL2693T-T37161 · Agador Slip, LLC · primary · contention set 2026-247 ISL2626T-T66950 · Innovation Service Limited · primary · contention set 2026-247 XI2694T-T10138 · XRegistry Incorporated · replacement string of .geek · Deactivated”
ICANN
Considering a name on .sns?Appraise a name on this TLD →

This record is corrected in the open. See the changelog and methodology.