.send

Is .send a real TLD? Who’s applying to run it?

.send is contested: 3 applications for it are on ICANN’s Reveal Day list, as of 7 October 2026. They are Innovation Service, NextGEN TLDs and Link Freedom Group.

Generic applications · AI & tech · on the record since Aug 15, 2026, updated Oct 7, 2026
applicants
3 applications

Who is applying, and what they run today

One of the three already run TLDs, 225K names between them. Link Freedom Group and NextGEN TLDs run none.

  • Innovation Service Limited

    Innovation Service

    controlled by Heng Lu

    1 TLDs · 225K names: .help 225K

    backup .nomad, disallowed

  • Link Freedom Group Ltd

    Link Freedom Group

    controlled by Vandelay Investments Ltd, Yonatan Belousov

    runs no TLD today

    backup .math

  • NextGEN TLDs GmbH

    NextGEN TLDs

    controlled by Philipp Grabensee, Roland LaPlante

    runs no TLD today

    backup .rank

runs TLDs today; the larger, the more namesruns none.tld in orange: one of this string’s closest 2012 stringsbackup .x usable · backup .x ✕ disallowed

Applications are counted by company, across its legal entities, from ICANN’s list. Names are from the registries’ June 2026 reports to ICANN. “None on record” means no public source in our record ties the company to a registry operator that runs TLDs today. Control: each application’s own answer to ICANN (question 108). Largest TLDs and names: the registries’ monthly reports to ICANN.

Will names sell?

◈AI score
47/ 100
Usable but limited

A catchy action word for payments, transfers, and file-sharing tools, but most serious projects would treat it as a side domain, not home.

assessed by claude-fable-5 · Aug 15, 2026

Last round the AI scored the 2012 strings blind to their fate. Strings it scored 60 or more hold a median 27,168 names today; those under 30, a median of 30. .send’s closest 2012 strings hold .pay 882 and .call 2.

AI score 47 of 100. .com scores 96, .ai scores 84.

For comparison, .com scores 96 and .ai scores 84 on the same rubric.

How the AI’s blind 2012 read held up: its score of each 2012 string against the names it holds today808 2012-round TLDs. Scored 60 or more: median 27168 names. Scored under 30: median 30 names. .send's closest 2012 strings: .pay scored 60, 882 names; .call scored 30, 2 names.101001K10K100K1M020406080100scored 60+: median 27Kunder 30: median 30.pay · 60 · 882.call · 30 · 2the AI’s blind 2012 score of each string (its own scale) →names held today (log) →

a 2012-round TLD.send’s closest 2012 strings: score · names

The 2012 read is a separate, time-locked score on its own scale, so .send’s score above is not placed on it. Names: the registries’ reports to ICANN, 2026-10. Non-brand 2012 TLDs in the root.

closest 2012 strings
3 of 1,408

The nearest 2012 strings, and how many names each holds today

The closest 2012 string, .pay, held 882 names, June 2026. .call held 2. Chosen by AI from every string in the 2012 round, without being told what happened to any of them.

  1. .paystrong parallel882 names, June 2026live since 2016 · 2 applications in 2012 · scored 60* in 2012 · Amazon EU S.à r.l.See .pay in Stats

    Same bet exactly: a one-syllable English imperative verb for a money-or-thing-in-motion action, wanted by payments and platform giants as a call-to-action namespace whose value depends on owning a verb consumers already say rather than on any definable category of registrants.

  2. .callstrong parallel2 names, June 2026live since 2015 · uncontested in 2012 · scored 30* in 2012 · Amazon EU S.à r.l.See .call in Stats

    Also a bare communications verb positioned as a do-this-now namespace for telecom and messaging players, and like the target it only pays off if the operator can convert a universal action word into branded destinations instead of selling it to an industry.

  3. .mailmoderatenever delegated · 7 applications in 2012 · scored 70* in 2012

    Same underlying job — dispatching something to someone — and the same buyer profile of messaging and delivery incumbents, but it reads primarily as a noun with entrenched postal and inbox associations, so its identity pull is narrower than an open-ended action verb.

Names are from the registries’ monthly reports to ICANN. Each name opens the TLD’s stats page: how it grew, who sells it, and the 2026 strings compared with it. * A separate 2012-only read, time-locked to what was public that year, on a different scale from this page’s score.

Where they meet elsewhere

NextGEN TLDs and Link Freedom Group face each other in 7 contests this round, .send included.

  • Link Freedom Group × NextGEN TLDs
    7
  • Link Freedom Group × Innovation Service
    3
  • NextGEN TLDs × Innovation Service
    1

Shared contests: strings where both companies hold an application on ICANN’s list. Companies that meet another here in fewer than three are left out.

who it’s for

fintech and payments startups, crypto transfer and wallet products, and file-sharing or messaging tools that want an action-oriented call-to-action domain (pay.send, files.send style)

What a .send domain is

.send is not a TLD yet. It is a string on our record of the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round, in our AI & tech category. 3 applications for it are on ICANN’s Reveal Day list.

Is the .send domain extension real yet?

.send is not yet a domain extension you can register: nothing resolves under it, and no registrar sells names in it. It is a string applicants have put forward in the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round, the process that decides whether it becomes one.

When can you buy a .send domain?

You can’t yet. A .send name can only be registered once the string is delegated (added to the DNS root) and its registry opens. Last round's closest parallel to .send was .pay, delegated on 10 August 2016.

Is .send a real TLD?

Not yet. .send is not in the DNS root, so nothing resolves under it. It’s here because .send is on ICANN’s Reveal Day list of applied-for strings. Every entry on this page links to its source.

Considering a name on .send?Appraise a name on this TLD →

This record is corrected in the open. See the changelog and methodology.