.pullandbear
Is .pullandbear a real TLD? Who’s applying to run it?
.pullandbear is not contested. One application for it is on ICANN’s Reveal Day list, as of 7 October 2026. It is Inditex.
A private brand namespace for one fashion label; useful to its owner for campaigns and trust, with no market for anyone else.
the Pull&Bear retail brand and its parent group's own marketing, store and e-commerce properties; no third-party registrants
The 2012 applications making the most similar bet. Chosen by AI from every string in that round, without being told what happened to any of them.
Identical bet: a fast-fashion apparel chain's own house brand as the primary consumer identity, owned by a single group that controls every store and every product carrying the name.
Same bet from the same market and category — a Spanish-origin high-street clothing chain putting its trademark on the TLD, with the added twist that the string is also a common noun it must out-shout.
Same bet at one remove from the parent: a youth/value-priced apparel banner inside a multi-brand fashion group applying for its own banner name rather than the group's.
What a .pullandbear domain is
.pullandbear is not a TLD yet. It is a string on our record of the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round, filed under Brand. One application for it is on ICANN’s Reveal Day list.
Is the .pullandbear domain extension real yet?
.pullandbear is not yet a domain extension you can register: nothing resolves under it, and no registrar sells names in it. It is a string applicants have put forward in the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round, the process that decides whether it becomes one.
When can you buy a .pullandbear domain?
You can’t yet. ICANN publishes every applied-for string on Reveal Day, 7 October 2026 at 18:00 UTC. A .pullandbear name can only be registered after that, once the string is delegated and its registry opens. Last round's closest parallel to .pullandbear was .zara, delegated on 27 October 2015.
Is .pullandbear a real TLD?
Not yet. .pullandbear is not in the DNS root, so nothing resolves under it. It’s here because .pullandbear is on ICANN’s Reveal Day list of applied-for strings. Every entry on this page links to its source.
- Inditex · first recordedICANN
“ITX2621T-T61922 · Industria de Diseño Textil S.A. · primary”ICANN
- Band chosen: 10-29 (vanity/narrow). The verified record shows a single confirmed application by Inditex (Industria de Diseño Textil S.A.) filed as the ICANN brand type, so by analogy with earlier-round dot-brands this is a closed namespace where the registry is the only registrant. End-use utility exists but is narrow: a brand TLD can serve as a trusted canonical address for campaigns, regional storefronts or anti-phishing signalling, and some retail and automotive dot-brands from the earlier round did move real traffic onto their own strings (inference from analogy). It is not in the 30-49 band because there are no registrations at volume or on price and no aftermarket at all; third parties cannot buy an address here, so the resale/brand-strength half of the scale is effectively zero. It is not in the 1-9 band because the owner is a large fashion group with a real reason to use the string as a primary identity for one of its labels, which is more than a joke or dead-letter string. By analogy, many earlier-round dot-brands were delegated and then lightly used or voluntarily retired, so the main market uncertainty over the next 5 years is whether the group actually migrates customer-facing properties onto the string or keeps it defensive; counts and dates from that earlier round are unknown to me here and are not asserted.