.protocol

Is .protocol a real TLD? Who’s applying to run it?

.protocol is not contested. One application for it is on ICANN’s Reveal Day list, as of 8 October 2026. It is Link Freedom Group. Identity Digital named .protocol as a backup string for five of its applications: .quantum, .goat, .verified, .merch and .drop. ICANN deactivated those backups, because another applicant applied for the same string or named it as a backup. Radix named .protocol as a backup string for its .firm application. ICANN deactivated it, because another applicant applied for the same string or named it as a backup.

Generic application · Crypto · on the record since Aug 15, 2026, updated Oct 8, 2026
applicants
1 application · 6 deactivated backups

Who is applying, and what they run today

Two of the 3 are tied to a registry that runs TLDs today. Identity Digital, Link Freedom Group and Radix filed 420 applications between them across the round.

  • Link Freedom Group Ltd

    Link Freedom Group

    controlled by Vandelay Investments Ltd, Yonatan Belousov

    runs no TLD today

    backup .icon, disallowed

runs TLDs today; the larger, the more namesruns none.tld in orange: one of this string’s closest 2012 stringsbackup .x usable · backup .x ✕ disallowed

Applications are counted by company, across its legal entities, from ICANN’s list. Names are from the registries’ June 2026 reports to ICANN. “None on record” means no public source in our record ties the company to a registry operator that runs TLDs today. Control: each application’s own answer to ICANN (question 108). Largest TLDs and names: the registries’ monthly reports to ICANN.

backups
  • Named on the ICANN gTLD application list, 7 October 2026 as a replacement (backup) string of the applicant's .drop application, shown as deactivated: another applicant applied for the same string or named it as a backup

    Deactivated backup for .dropGenericICANN BPL2623T-T12779ICANN ↗
  • RadixDeactivated backupradix.website ↗

    Named on the ICANN gTLD application list, 7 October 2026 as a replacement (backup) string of the applicant's .firm application, shown as deactivated: another applicant applied for the same string or named it as a backup

    Deactivated backup for .firmGenericICANN RTIS2674T-T42193ICANN ↗
  • Named on the ICANN gTLD application list, 7 October 2026 as a replacement (backup) string of the applicant's .merch application, shown as deactivated: another applicant applied for the same string or named it as a backup

    Deactivated backup for .merchGenericICANN BPL2623T-T20698ICANN ↗
  • Named on the ICANN gTLD application list, 7 October 2026 as a replacement (backup) string of the applicant's .verified application, shown as deactivated: another applicant applied for the same string or named it as a backup

    Deactivated backup for .verifiedGenericICANN BPL2623T-T25726ICANN ↗
  • Named on the ICANN gTLD application list, 7 October 2026 as a replacement (backup) string of the applicant's .goat application, shown as deactivated: another applicant applied for the same string or named it as a backup

    Deactivated backup for .goatGenericICANN BPL2623T-T36536ICANN ↗
  • Named on the ICANN gTLD application list, 7 October 2026 as a replacement (backup) string of the applicant's .quantum application, shown as deactivated: another applicant applied for the same string or named it as a backup

    Deactivated backup for .quantumGenericICANN BPL2623T-T84050ICANN ↗

Will names sell?

◈AI score
44/ 100
Usable but limited

A natural fit for crypto and infrastructure projects that call themselves protocols, but most will likely keep shorter, established endings.

assessed by claude-fable-5 · Aug 15, 2026

Last round the AI scored the 2012 strings blind to their fate. Strings it scored 60 or more hold a median 27,168 names today; those under 30, a median of 30. .protocol’s closest 2012 strings hold .network 80K, .systems 45K and .cloud 552K.

AI score 44 of 100. .com scores 96, .ai scores 84.

For comparison, .com scores 96 and .ai scores 84 on the same rubric.

How the AI’s blind 2012 read held up: its score of each 2012 string against the names it holds today808 2012-round TLDs. Scored 60 or more: median 27168 names. Scored under 30: median 30 names. .protocol's closest 2012 strings: .network scored 45, 80112 names; .systems scored 40, 44956 names; .cloud scored 70, 551867 names.101001K10K100K1M020406080100scored 60+: median 27Kunder 30: median 30.network · 45 · 80K.systems · 40 · 45K.cloud · 70 · 552Kthe AI’s blind 2012 score of each string (its own scale) →names held today (log) →

a 2012-round TLD.protocol’s closest 2012 strings: score · names

The 2012 read is a separate, time-locked score on its own scale, so .protocol’s score above is not placed on it. Names: the registries’ reports to ICANN, 2026-10. Non-brand 2012 TLDs in the root.

closest 2012 strings
3 of 1,408

The nearest 2012 strings, and how many names each holds today

The closest 2012 string, .network, held 80,112 names, June 2026. .systems held 44,956; .cloud held 551,867. Chosen by AI from every string in the 2012 round, without being told what happened to any of them.

  1. .networkstrong parallel80,112 names, June 2026live since 2014 · uncontested in 2012 · scored 45* in 2012 · Trixy Manor, LLCSee .network in Stats

    Same bet: a generic infrastructure noun that technical entities already carry inside their own names ("X Network" / "X Protocol"), so the registry is selling a suffix that completes an identity rather than describing a topic.

  2. .systemsstrong parallel44,956 names, June 2026live since 2013 · uncontested in 2012 · scored 40* in 2012 · Dash Cypress, LLCSee .systems in Stats

    Same bet: an abstract engineering-category noun bought by technical organizations as a self-description of what they are, wagering that builders prefer an architectural word over a commercial one.

  3. .cloudmoderate551,867 names, June 2026live since 2015 · 7 applications in 2012 · scored 70* in 2012 · ARUBA S.p.A.See .cloud in Stats

    Same bet on a computing term-of-art whose value depends on one technology movement keeping that word as its badge of identity, which makes it era-bound in the way a category noun like .systems is not.

Names are from the registries’ monthly reports to ICANN. Each name opens the TLD’s stats page: how it grew, who sells it, and the 2026 strings compared with it. * A separate 2012-only read, time-locked to what was public that year, on a different scale from this page’s score.

Where they meet elsewhere

Identity Digital and Link Freedom Group face each other in 68 contests this round, .protocol included.

  • Identity Digital × Link Freedom Group
    68
  • Identity Digital × Radix
    36
  • Link Freedom Group × Radix
    24

Shared contests: strings where both companies hold an application on ICANN’s list. Companies that meet another here in fewer than three are left out.

who it’s for

crypto and DeFi teams that brand as 'X Protocol', plus network/standards infrastructure projects and developer-tool startups wanting a technical-sounding identity.

What a .protocol domain is

.protocol is not a TLD yet. It is a string on our record of the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round, in our Crypto category. One application for it is on ICANN’s Reveal Day list.

Is the .protocol domain extension real yet?

.protocol is not yet a domain extension you can register: nothing resolves under it, and no registrar sells names in it. It is a string applicants have put forward in the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round, the process that decides whether it becomes one.

When can you buy a .protocol domain?

You can’t yet. A .protocol name can only be registered once the string is delegated (added to the DNS root) and its registry opens. Last round's closest parallel to .protocol was .network, delegated on 22 August 2014.

Is .protocol a real TLD?

Not yet. .protocol is not in the DNS root, so nothing resolves under it. It’s here because .protocol is on ICANN’s Reveal Day list of applied-for strings. Every entry on this page links to its source.

Considering a name on .protocol?Appraise a name on this TLD →

This record is corrected in the open. See the changelog and methodology.