.pearl

Is .pearl a real TLD? Who’s applying to run it?

Nobody is chasing .pearl, as of 7 October 2026. One applicant claimed it and is out. We keep the entry on the record either way.

Category: Commerce
  • Journey To The WestAbandoned
on the record since Aug 17, 2026 · updated Oct 7, 2026
◈AI score
22/ 100
Vanity and narrow

A pretty luxury keyword with a small jewelry-and-boutique niche; few serious businesses would make it their main address.

assessed by claude-fable-5 · Aug 17, 2026
AI score 22 of 100. .com scores 96, .ai scores 84.
who it’s for

jewelry and pearl sellers, boutique luxury and craft brands, wedding and beauty businesses, and people or projects named Pearl looking for a memorable vanity address

CommerceBrandCulture
applicants
0 applications · 1 abandoned claim
Aug 17, 2026

xiyou.domains ↗

In Journey To The West's published portfolio of 323 strings submitted in the ICANN 2026 round (flagship tier). Their catalog line: “Formed under pressure into something rare.”

announced Aug 17, 2026 · abandoned Oct 7, 2026

closest 2012 bets
3 of 1,408

The 2012 applications making the most similar bet. Chosen by AI from every string in that round, without being told what happened to any of them.

.diamondsstrong parallel
delegated 2013 · live2,091 domains · May 2026

Same bet: a precious-gem material noun opened as a generic namespace whose value rests on jewelers, dealers and gift retailers being willing to move primary identity onto a category word they all share rather than one they own.

uncontested · scored 40* in 2012 · run by John Edge, LLC

See .diamonds in Stats
.goldmoderate
delegated 2015 · live16,017 domains · May 2026

Same dual-life bet as pearl — a short precious-material word that has to earn registrations from both the literal trade and the much larger pool of buyers using it as a quality/premium metaphor, since neither audience alone fills it.

2 applicants contested it · scored 45* in 2012 · run by June Edge, LLC

See .gold in Stats
.jewelrymoderate
delegated 2015 · live4,000 domains · May 2026

The adjacent version of the same wager — an unowned trade-category noun sold to the identical merchant base, differing only in that it names the industry outright while pearl names the material and so leans harder on evocative rather than descriptive demand.

2 applicants contested it · scored 50* in 2012 · run by Wild Bloom, LLC

See .jewelry in Stats

* A separate 2012-only read, time-locked to what was public that year. Different scale from this page’s score, so the two are not comparable.

What a .pearl domain is

.pearl is not a TLD yet. It is a string on our record of the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round, in our Commerce category. Nobody is chasing .pearl today. The applicants that claimed it are out.

Is the .pearl domain extension real yet?

.pearl is not yet a domain extension you can register: nothing resolves under it, and no registrar sells names in it. Nobody has applied for it on the public record; the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round is the process that would decide whether it becomes one.

When can you buy a .pearl domain?

You can’t yet. A .pearl name can only be registered once the string is delegated (added to the DNS root) and its registry opens. Last round's closest parallel to .pearl was .diamonds, delegated on 19 November 2013.

Is .pearl a real TLD?

Not yet. .pearl is not in the DNS root, so nothing resolves under it. It’s here because an applicant claimed .pearl and is no longer in it. We keep the entry, and every entry on this page links to its source.

history
  1. Journey To The West · now abandonedOct 7, 2026

    Announced, but not on the ICANN Reveal Day list, 7 October 2026

    ICANN
  2. Journey To The West · first recordedAug 17, 2026
    Journey To The West Corporation
news & sources
ICANNICANN Reveal Day list, 7 October 2026
Oct 7, 2026
ICANN
Announcementxiyou.domains: published portfolio of 323 submitted gTLD applications
“.pearl · Flagship · “Formed under pressure into something rare.””
Journey To The West Corporation
Considering a name on .pearl?Appraise a name on this TLD →

This record is corrected in the open. See the changelog and methodology.