.order

Is .order a real TLD? Who’s applying to run it?

.order is contested: 2 applications for it are on ICANN’s Reveal Day list, as of 7 October 2026. They are CamConnecting and Link Freedom Group.

Generic applications · Commerce · on the record since Aug 15, 2026, updated Oct 7, 2026
applicants
2 applications

Who is applying, and what they run today

One of the two already run TLDs, 68K names between them. Link Freedom Group runs none.

  • Cam Connecting SARL

    CamConnecting

    1 TLDs · 68K names: .cam 68K

    backup .omg, disallowed

  • Link Freedom Group Ltd

    Link Freedom Group

    controlled by Vandelay Investments Ltd, Yonatan Belousov

    runs no TLD today

    backup .zoom, disallowed

runs TLDs today; the larger, the more namesruns none.tld in orange: one of this string’s closest 2012 stringsbackup .x usable · backup .x ✕ disallowed

Applications are counted by company, across its legal entities, from ICANN’s list. Names are from the registries’ June 2026 reports to ICANN. “None on record” means no public source in our record ties the company to a registry operator that runs TLDs today. Control: each application’s own answer to ICANN (question 108). Largest TLDs and names: the registries’ monthly reports to ICANN.

Will names sell?

◈AI score
38/ 100
Usable but limited

A call-to-action web address for online ordering; handy for links and campaigns, but few businesses would make it their main identity.

assessed by claude-fable-5 · Aug 15, 2026

Last round the AI scored the 2012 strings blind to their fate. Strings it scored 60 or more hold a median 27,168 names today; those under 30, a median of 30. .order’s closest 2012 strings hold .buy 2, .book 2 and .pay 882.

AI score 38 of 100. .com scores 96, .ai scores 84.

For comparison, .com scores 96 and .ai scores 84 on the same rubric.

How the AI’s blind 2012 read held up: its score of each 2012 string against the names it holds today808 2012-round TLDs. Scored 60 or more: median 27168 names. Scored under 30: median 30 names. .order's closest 2012 strings: .buy scored 65, 2 names; .book scored 62, 2 names; .pay scored 60, 882 names.101001K10K100K1M020406080100scored 60+: median 27Kunder 30: median 30.buy · 65 · 2.book · 62 · 2.pay · 60 · 882the AI’s blind 2012 score of each string (its own scale) →names held today (log) →

a 2012-round TLD.order’s closest 2012 strings: score · names

The 2012 read is a separate, time-locked score on its own scale, so .order’s score above is not placed on it. Names: the registries’ reports to ICANN, 2026-10. Non-brand 2012 TLDs in the root.

closest 2012 strings
3 of 1,408

The nearest 2012 strings, and how many names each holds today

The closest 2012 string, .buy, held 2 names, June 2026. .book held 2; .pay held 882. Chosen by AI from every string in the 2012 round, without being told what happened to any of them.

  1. .buystrong parallel2 names, June 2026live since 2015 · 5 applications in 2012 · scored 65* in 2012 · Amazon EU S.à r.l.See .buy in Stats

    Same bet: a bare, ubiquitous English transaction verb sold as a call-to-action address for merchants and platforms, so nobody's primary identity lives there and the registry is renting a checkout step rather than a category membership.

  2. .bookstrong parallel2 names, June 2026live since 2015 · 9 applications in 2012 · scored 62* in 2012 · Amazon EU S.à r.l.See .book in Stats

    Same bet in a narrower vertical: a transactional verb-noun naming the moment a customer commits, bought by ordering/booking intermediaries as an action URL rather than as a statement of who the registrant is.

  3. .paymoderate882 names, June 2026live since 2016 · 2 applications in 2012 · scored 60* in 2012 · Amazon EU S.à r.l.See .pay in Stats

    Adjacent stage of the same commerce workflow with the same one-word-verb structure, but it skews toward financial institutions defending a payments identity rather than merchants renting a generic transaction verb.

Names are from the registries’ monthly reports to ICANN. Each name opens the TLD’s stats page: how it grew, who sells it, and the 2026 strings compared with it. * A separate 2012-only read, time-locked to what was public that year, on a different scale from this page’s score.

who it’s for

restaurants, food-delivery services, and e-commerce brands wanting a memorable direct-ordering link (brand.order), plus marketers running order-now campaigns

What a .order domain is

.order is not a TLD yet. It is a string on our record of the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round, in our Commerce category. 2 applications for it are on ICANN’s Reveal Day list.

Is the .order domain extension real yet?

.order is not yet a domain extension you can register: nothing resolves under it, and no registrar sells names in it. It is a string applicants have put forward in the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round, the process that decides whether it becomes one.

When can you buy a .order domain?

You can’t yet. A .order name can only be registered once the string is delegated (added to the DNS root) and its registry opens. Last round's closest parallel to .order was .buy, delegated on 5 December 2015.

Is .order a real TLD?

Not yet. .order is not in the DNS root, so nothing resolves under it. It’s here because .order is on ICANN’s Reveal Day list of applied-for strings. Every entry on this page links to its source.

Considering a name on .order?Appraise a name on this TLD →

This record is corrected in the open. See the changelog and methodology.