.near
Is .near a real TLD? Who’s applying to run it?
Nobody has applied for .near in its own right, as of 7 October 2026. Link Freedom Group named .near as the backup string of its .mvp application.
Nobody has applied for .near in its own right.
Will names sell?
A crypto-flavored web address built on a common English word; useful for some, but a niche choice that needs explaining.
Last round the AI scored the 2012 strings blind to their fate. Strings it scored 60 or more hold a median 27,168 names today; those under 30, a median of 30. .near’s closest 2012 strings hold .here 4, .spot 2K and .now 27K.
The nearest 2012 strings, and how many names each holds today
The closest 2012 string, .here, held 4 names, June 2026. .spot held 1,606; .now held 27,481. Chosen by AI from every string in the 2012 round, without being told what happened to any of them.
Same bet exactly: a short relational/deictic English word with no category meaning of its own, sold on the idea that proximity-and-location services can hang their primary identity on a positional word rather than a noun describing what they sell.
Same class of bet — a plain, evocative place-word that names no industry, so its value depends entirely on registrants reading a location/'where you are' meaning into it rather than on category-matched demand.
The temporal twin of the same wager: an abstract adverb with universal appeal and zero category anchor, betting that immediacy/context words can carry brands across unrelated verticals instead of serving one defined buyer.
crypto and web3 teams building in or around the NEAR ecosystem, plus local-commerce and proximity-tech projects drawn to the generic English word (near me, nearby services).
What a .near domain is
.near is not a TLD yet. It is a string on our record of the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round, in our Crypto category. Nobody has applied for .near in its own right. It is named on ICANN’s list as part of an application for another string.
Is the .near domain extension real yet?
.near is not yet a domain extension you can register: nothing resolves under it, and no registrar sells names in it. Nobody has applied for it on the public record; the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round is the process that would decide whether it becomes one.
When can you buy a .near domain?
You can’t yet. A .near name can only be registered once the string is delegated (added to the DNS root) and its registry opens. Last round's closest parallel to .near was .here, delegated on 29 August 2014.
Is .near a real TLD?
Not yet. .near is not in the DNS root, so nothing resolves under it. It’s here because ICANN’s list names .near as part of an application for another string. Every entry on this page links to its source.
- Link Freedom Group · now replacementICANN
- Link Freedom Group · first recordedLink Freedom Group
“LFGL2683T-T96989 · Link Freedom Group Ltd · replacement string of .mvp”ICANN
“.near · Crypto & Web3 · “Closer than you think.””Link Freedom Group
- Band chosen: 30-49, usable but limited. The string carries two demand sources: it matches the name of a known blockchain ecosystem (from my own knowledge, no figures asserted), and it is a common English word for proximity, which supports local-commerce and location-adjacent uses. By analogy (flagged as analogy), crypto-themed extensions in the ICANN root have tended to see event-driven registration spikes rather than sustained primary-identity adoption, since web3 projects often prefer on-chain naming systems or established extensions for their main web presence; that pattern caps this string below the 50-69 band, where genuine sustained primary-identity demand would be required. It sits above the 10-29 band because the generic-word meaning gives it a second, non-meme demand channel and plausible serious end-use beyond novelty, and the applicant's stated positioning (category Crypto & Web3, tagline 'Closer than you think.') leans into both readings. The applicant, Link Freedom Group, filed more than 300 strings in the ICANN 2026 round and published its list ahead of Reveal Day; a broad-portfolio applicant suggests generalist registry marketing rather than ecosystem-native distribution, which tempers adoption likelihood over the next 5 years (a neutral observation about go-to-market, not the operator). Main market uncertainty: whether the matching blockchain community embraces the ICANN-root extension as complementary to its on-chain naming, ignores it, or treats it as unaffiliated, since that single dynamic drives most of the realistic aftermarket.