.leads

Is .leads a real TLD? Who’s applying to run it?

Nobody has applied for .leads in its own right, as of 7 October 2026. GoDaddy Registry named .leads as the replacement string of its .crm application.

Commerce
on the record since Oct 7, 2026 · updated Oct 7, 2026
◈AI score
30/ 100
Usable but limited

A keyword address for the lead-generation trade: useful for campaign pages, rarely a company's main name.

assessed by claude-fable-5-1 · Oct 7, 2026
AI score 30 of 100. .com scores 96, .ai scores 84.
who it’s for

lead-generation agencies, affiliate marketers and B2B sales-tool vendors who want a keyword domain for campaign landing pages and vertical lead marketplaces

CommercetechOther
applicants
0 applications · 1 backup

No applications recorded for this TLD yet.

backups
GoDaddy RegistryReplacement

Applied as Registry Services, LLC · registry.godaddy ↗

Replacement for .crmGenericICANN NA2631T-T27230ICANN ↗
closest 2012 bets
3 of 1,408

The 2012 applications making the most similar bet. Chosen by AI from every string in that round, without being told what happened to any of them.

.marketingstrong parallel
delegated 2014 · live29,214 domains · May 2026

Same bet exactly: a generic, uncontested business-function noun sold as the identity layer for the commercial-services industry that lives on it, where value depends on thousands of agencies and vendors treating an insider trade word as a credible primary address rather than a redirect.

3 applicants contested it · scored 55* in 2012 · run by Fern Pass, LLC

See .marketing in Stats
.couponsmoderate
delegated 2015 · live8,250 domains · May 2026

Also a plural noun naming the tradeable unit of a performance-marketing trade rather than a product or place, betting that affiliate-style operators who buy and resell that unit will put their primary identity on the unit's own name.

2 applicants contested it · scored 50* in 2012 · run by Black Island, LLC

See .coupons in Stats
.analyticsmoderate
delegated 2015 · live4 domains · May 2026

A narrow B2B jargon abstraction aimed at a small professional vendor class, sharing the same vulnerability as the target: the word is understood only inside the trade, so the addressable base is a vendor roster, not a consumer category.

uncontested · scored 45* in 2012 · run by Campus IP LLC

See .analytics in Stats

* A separate 2012-only read, time-locked to what was public that year. Different scale from this page’s score, so the two are not comparable.

What a .leads domain is

.leads is not a TLD yet. It is a string on our record of the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round, filed under Commerce. Nobody has applied for .leads in its own right. It is named on ICANN’s list as part of an application for another string.

Is the .leads domain extension real yet?

.leads is not yet a domain extension you can register: nothing resolves under it, and no registrar sells names in it. Nobody has applied for it on the public record; the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round is the process that would decide whether it becomes one.

When can you buy a .leads domain?

You can’t yet. ICANN publishes every applied-for string on Reveal Day, 7 October 2026 at 18:00 UTC. A .leads name can only be registered after that, once the string is delegated and its registry opens. Last round's closest parallel to .leads was .marketing, delegated on 14 January 2014.

Is .leads a real TLD?

Not yet. .leads is not in the DNS root, so nothing resolves under it. It’s here because ICANN’s list names .leads as part of an application for another string. Every entry on this page links to its source.

history
  1. GoDaddy Registry · first recordedOct 7, 2026
    ICANN
news & sources
ICANNICANN Reveal Day list, 7 October 2026
Oct 7, 2026
“NA2631T-T27230 · Registry Services, LLC · replacement string of .crm”
ICANN
about GoDaddy Registry
ICANNICANN gTLD application list, 7 October 2026
Oct 7, 2026
“LFGL2683T-T82030 · Link Freedom Group Ltd · primary NA2631T-T80151 · Registry Services, LLC · replacement string of .all · Deactivated”
ICANN
Considering a name on .leads?Appraise a name on this TLD →

This record is corrected in the open. See the changelog and methodology.