.inter
Is .inter a real TLD? Who’s applying to run it?
Nobody has applied for .inter in its own right, as of 7 October 2026. Link Freedom Group named .inter as the backup string of its .research application.
Nobody has applied for .inter in its own right.
Will names sell?
A word-fragment ending with no clear meaning; a handful of Inter-named brands and fans might care, most buyers have no reason to pick it.
Last round the AI scored the 2012 strings blind to their fate. Strings it scored 60 or more hold a median 27,168 names today; those under 30, a median of 30. .inter’s closest 2012 strings hold .eco 10K, .international 27K and .bio 69K.
The nearest 2012 strings, and how many names each holds today
The closest 2012 string, .eco, held 9,939 names, June 2026. .international held 27,382; .bio held 69,202. Chosen by AI from every string in the 2012 round, without being told what happened to any of them.
Same bet as .inter: a short Latinate combining form rather than a standalone category noun, sold as a qualifier that any registrant can bolt onto their name, so the registry is wagering that a prefix morpheme reads as a complete label with no defined class of buyer behind it.
Targets exactly the buyer .inter implies — the cross-border/multinational operator claiming reach rather than a trade — but it is the full dictionary word doing the claiming, where .inter asks the truncation to carry the same meaning.
Also a three-to-five-letter combining form monetized as a generic adjectival slot, but its prefix carries a concrete sector connotation (life sciences, organic) that gives it a recognizable registrant base, whereas .inter's semantics stay purely relational and buyer-less.
fans and organizations whose name contains 'Inter' - football-club communities, companies with Inter-prefixed names - plus speculators betting one of those brands adopts the string.
What a .inter domain is
.inter is not a TLD yet. It is a string on our record of the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round, in our Brand category. Nobody has applied for .inter in its own right. It is named on ICANN’s list as part of an application for another string.
Is the .inter domain extension real yet?
.inter is not yet a domain extension you can register: nothing resolves under it, and no registrar sells names in it. Nobody has applied for it on the public record; the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round is the process that would decide whether it becomes one.
When can you buy a .inter domain?
You can’t yet. A .inter name can only be registered once the string is delegated (added to the DNS root) and its registry opens. Last round's closest parallel to .inter was .eco, delegated on 28 August 2016.
Is .inter a real TLD?
Not yet. .inter is not in the DNS root, so nothing resolves under it. It’s here because ICANN’s list names .inter as part of an application for another string. Every entry on this page links to its source.
- Link Freedom Group · now replacementICANN
- Link Freedom Group · first recordedLink Freedom Group
“LFGL2683T-T11388 · Link Freedom Group Ltd · replacement string of .research”ICANN
“.inter · Lifestyle · “Always in the mix.””Link Freedom Group
- I place .inter in the 10-29 vanity/narrow band, at 18. The string is a Latin prefix, not a complete word: 'something.inter' reads as an unfinished compound, and unlike suffix strings that complete a word to the left (the .ing pattern, which produced genuine domain-hack demand by analogy), a prefix on the right side of the dot completes nothing. Its main real-world resonance is as a proper name - several prominent football clubs, a digital bank, and a widely used typeface carry 'Inter' as their brand - but those are closed brand interests, and an open registry cannot convert them into broad registrant demand; at best they yield defensive registrations and fan-community vanity names. There is also a plausible end-user confusion drag with the long-standing restricted .int namespace, which by analogy with other near-collision strings tends to suppress serious primary-identity use. It is not in the 30-49 band because I see no volume or price-driven registration engine: no dictionary meaning, no vertical, no geo, no hack pattern, so even cheap-registration demand lacks a story. It is not in the 1-9 band because the Inter-branded sports and fintech names are globally recognizable and their fan bases plus defensive registrants constitute a small but real market over the next 5 years. The applicant facts are neutral context: LFG filed more than 300 strings in the 2026 round and lists this one under 'Lifestyle' with the tagline 'Always in the mix.', which signals a broad open-registry positioning rather than a brand or community play; portfolio-scale operators can keep such strings available cheaply, which fits a low-volume vanity trajectory. Registration volumes, pricing, and any brand-holder interest are unknown. My main market uncertainty: whether any major Inter-named organization (a football club or fintech) would embrace the namespace for fan or product identities, which is the only path I see to sustained niche demand.