.index
Is .index a real TLD? Who’s applying to run it?
.index is not contested. One applicant has said publicly that it applied to run it, and nobody else has, as of 15 August 2026. It is Link Freedom Group.
A real word with meaning in data, docs, and finance, but few serious projects would make .index their main web address.
developers and data/search infrastructure teams building index or catalog products, plus fintech projects themed around market or fund indexes and documentation or directory sites
In LFG's published list of 300+ strings submitted before the ICANN window closed on 2026-08-12. Their catalog tagline: “Everything in its right place.”
The 2012 applications making the most similar bet. Chosen by AI from every string in that round, without being told what happened to any of them.
Same bet exactly: an abstract generic noun for an organized listing, sold to aggregators and listing publishers who want the TLD itself to declare what the site is, and it only works if enough of those operators will re-root their primary identity on a descriptive suffix.
Also a generic reference-artifact noun bought by curators and compilers of information rather than by a company or community, though it leans editorial/human-written where index leans mechanical/comprehensive.
Same family of findability-infrastructure generics — a bare functional noun whose buyers are discovery and retrieval operators — but it names the act of looking rather than the compiled record, so the identity it confers is a service rather than a catalog.
What a .index domain is
.index is not a TLD yet. It is a string on our record of the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round, filed under Infrastructure. One applicant has said publicly that it applied for .index.
Is the .index domain extension real yet?
.index is not yet a domain extension you can register: nothing resolves under it, and no registrar sells names in it. It is a string applicants have put forward in the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round, the process that decides whether it becomes one.
When can you buy a .index domain?
You can’t yet. ICANN publishes every applied-for string on Reveal Day, 7 October 2026 at 18:00 UTC. A .index name can only be registered after that, once the string is delegated and its registry opens. Last round's closest parallel to .index was .directory, delegated on .
Is .index a real TLD?
Not yet. .index is not in the DNS root, so nothing resolves under it. It’s here because an applicant said publicly that it applied for .index in the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round. Every claim on this page links to its source.
- Link Freedom Group · first recordedLink Freedom Group
“.index · Infra · “Everything in its right place.””Link Freedom Group
“LFG voluntarily published its full list of submissions ahead of ICANN’s official Reveal Day.”PR Newswire (Link Freedom Group)
“Top level domain registry Link Freedom Group (LFG) has disclosed more than 300 strings submitted as part of the ICANN new top level domain name program.”Domain Name Wire (Andrew Allemann)
- Band: usable but limited (30-49). The string is a genuine dictionary word with plausible end-uses across several verticals over the next 5 years: search and database infrastructure (an 'index' is a core primitive), documentation and catalog sites (the index.html idiom gives it developer resonance), and finance (market and fund indexes). That semantic breadth keeps it out of the 10-29 vanity band: registrations at some volume are plausible and a handful of primary-identity uses by index-themed products are credible. It stays below the 50-69 strong-niche band because, by analogy (flagged as analogy) with other descriptive-noun infrastructure TLDs such as .systems, .network, .solutions and .directory, these strings tend to attract volume on price and defensive or secondary registrations rather than sustained primary-identity demand, and the word 'index' rarely names a business outright, so the brand signal is weak and the aftermarket is likely thin. The finance vertical, which has the deepest pockets, is conservative about namespaces and would need convincing to leave incumbent extensions for a novel one. Applicant context: the string is one entry in a very large portfolio filing (LFG, more than 300 strings in the 2026 round, catalog category 'Infra'), which is neutral for the string itself but suggests broad portfolio economics rather than a single-string category push; specific launch marketing plans are unknown. Main market uncertainty: whether the finance/index-fund vertical or the developer-tools vertical produces any cluster of primary-identity adopters, versus the TLD settling into low-price volume registrations; that split spans roughly the 30s versus the low 50s on this scale.