.hit

Is .hit a real TLD? Who’s applying to run it?

.hit is not contested. One application for it is on ICANN’s Reveal Day list, as of 7 October 2026. It is Link Freedom Group. ShortDot named .hit as a backup string for its .tap application. ICANN deactivated it, because another applicant applied for the same string or named it as a backup.

Generic application · Culture · on the record since Aug 15, 2026, updated Oct 7, 2026
applicants
1 application · 1 deactivated backup

Who is applying, and what they run today

One of the 2 is tied to a registry that runs TLDs today. Link Freedom Group and ShortDot filed 198 applications between them across the round.

  • Link Freedom Group Ltd

    Link Freedom Group

    controlled by Vandelay Investments Ltd, Yonatan Belousov

    runs no TLD today

    backup .magic, disallowed

runs TLDs today; the larger, the more namesruns none.tld in orange: one of this string’s closest 2012 stringsbackup .x usable · backup .x ✕ disallowed

Applications are counted by company, across its legal entities, from ICANN’s list. Names are from the registries’ June 2026 reports to ICANN. “None on record” means no public source in our record ties the company to a registry operator that runs TLDs today. Control: each application’s own answer to ICANN (question 108). Largest TLDs and names: the registries’ monthly reports to ICANN.

backups
  • ShortDotDeactivated backupshortdot.bond ↗

    One of the 80 strings ShortDot published for the ICANN 2026 round. ShortDot states it has submitted 40 applications, but publishes the 80 strings without revealing which 40 are applications and which 40 are designated replacements. The submission claim is therefore applicant-level, not string-level: nothing in the source says ShortDot applied for THIS string. Catalogued, not announced.

    listed in a catalog Sep 8, 2026 · announced Sep 9, 2026 · abandoned Oct 7, 2026 · named as a backup for .tap, deactivated by ICANN Oct 7, 2026

    Deactivated backup for .tapGenericICANN NA2626T-T64063ShortDot (Ireland) Limited ↗

Will names sell?

◈AI score
28/ 100
Vanity and narrow

A catchy word for music and promo campaigns, but few serious projects would make .hit their main web address.

assessed by claude-fable-5 · Aug 15, 2026

Last round the AI scored the 2012 strings blind to their fate. Strings it scored 60 or more hold a median 27,168 names today; those under 30, a median of 30. .hit’s closest 2012 strings hold .win 158K, .hot 1K and .best 54K.

AI score 28 of 100. .com scores 96, .ai scores 84.

For comparison, .com scores 96 and .ai scores 84 on the same rubric.

How the AI’s blind 2012 read held up: its score of each 2012 string against the names it holds today808 2012-round TLDs. Scored 60 or more: median 27168 names. Scored under 30: median 30 names. .hit's closest 2012 strings: .win scored 40, 157852 names; .hot scored 40, 1185 names; .best scored 45, 54475 names.101001K10K100K1M020406080100scored 60+: median 27Kunder 30: median 30.win · 40 · 158K.hot · 40 · 1K.best · 45 · 54Kthe AI’s blind 2012 score of each string (its own scale) →names held today (log) →

a 2012-round TLD.hit’s closest 2012 strings: score · names

The 2012 read is a separate, time-locked score on its own scale, so .hit’s score above is not placed on it. Names: the registries’ reports to ICANN, 2026-10. Non-brand 2012 TLDs in the root.

closest 2012 strings
3 of 1,408

The nearest 2012 strings, and how many names each holds today

The closest 2012 string, .win, held 157,852 names, June 2026. .hot held 1,185; .best held 54,475. Chosen by AI from every string in the 2012 round, without being told what happened to any of them.

  1. .winstrong parallel157,852 names, June 2026live since 2015 · uncontested in 2012 · scored 40* in 2012 · First Registry LimitedSee .win in Stats

    Same bet: a short, punchy English success word with no defined registrant class, sold on connotation and wordplay to an open mass market rather than to any industry that already owns the term.

  2. .hotmoderate1,185 names, June 2026live since 2016 · 3 applications in 2012 · scored 40* in 2012 · Amazon EU S.à r.l.See .hot in Stats

    Also a monosyllabic vibe word whose value is entirely in the phrase it completes, betting that generic positive-affect language can carry an open registry instead of a category of businesses.

  3. .bestmoderate54,475 names, June 2026live since 2014 · uncontested in 2012 · scored 45* in 2012 · BestTLD Pty LtdSee .best in Stats

    Another connotation-driven English superlative with no natural incumbent constituency, banking on cheap volume registrations from anyone wanting the word's flattery rather than on a professional or vertical identity.

Names are from the registries’ monthly reports to ICANN. Each name opens the TLD’s stats page: how it grew, who sells it, and the 2026 strings compared with it. * A separate 2012-only read, time-locked to what was public that year, on a different scale from this page’s score.

who it’s for

musicians, labels, and entertainment marketers running promo or campaign microsites; secondarily speculators buying short generic words on price

What a .hit domain is

.hit is not a TLD yet. It is a string on our record of the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round, in our Culture category. One application for it is on ICANN’s Reveal Day list.

Is the .hit domain extension real yet?

.hit is not yet a domain extension you can register: nothing resolves under it, and no registrar sells names in it. It is a string applicants have put forward in the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round, the process that decides whether it becomes one.

When can you buy a .hit domain?

You can’t yet. A .hit name can only be registered once the string is delegated (added to the DNS root) and its registry opens. Last round's closest parallel to .hit was .win, delegated on 25 March 2015.

Is .hit a real TLD?

Not yet. .hit is not in the DNS root, so nothing resolves under it. It’s here because .hit is on ICANN’s Reveal Day list of applied-for strings. Every entry on this page links to its source.

Considering a name on .hit?Appraise a name on this TLD →

This record is corrected in the open. See the changelog and methodology.