.glam
Is .glam a real TLD? Who’s applying to run it?
Nobody has applied for .glam in its own right, as of 7 October 2026. EchoStar named .glam as the replacement string of its .super application.
A catchy beauty-and-fashion vanity ending: fun for creators and salons, but rarely a serious main address.
beauty and fashion creators, salons, makeup artists and lifestyle brands wanting a playful, short, image-led web address
No applications recorded for this TLD yet.
The 2012 applications making the most similar bet. Chosen by AI from every string in that round, without being told what happened to any of them.
Same bet as .glam: a short, clipped aspiration adjective that sells a desirability register rather than naming an industry, so it only works if businesses will put their primary identity on a vibe word no category owns.
Also an aesthetic-quality word rather than a trade or product noun, pitched at the same stylists, salons and fashion-adjacent brands, but it is a neutral mainstream noun where .glam carries a narrower slang register.
Chases essentially the same buyer putting its identity on the string, but it is a precise category noun backed by a defined industry, whereas .glam bets on a mood buyers must self-identify with.
What a .glam domain is
.glam is not a TLD yet. It is a string on our record of the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round, filed under Culture. Nobody has applied for .glam in its own right. It is named on ICANN’s list as part of an application for another string.
Is the .glam domain extension real yet?
.glam is not yet a domain extension you can register: nothing resolves under it, and no registrar sells names in it. Nobody has applied for it on the public record; the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round is the process that would decide whether it becomes one.
When can you buy a .glam domain?
You can’t yet. ICANN publishes every applied-for string on Reveal Day, 7 October 2026 at 18:00 UTC. A .glam name can only be registered after that, once the string is delegated and its registry opens. Last round's closest parallel to .glam was .luxe, delegated on 15 May 2014.
Is .glam a real TLD?
Not yet. .glam is not in the DNS root, so nothing resolves under it. It’s here because ICANN’s list names .glam as part of an application for another string. Every entry on this page links to its source.
- EchoStar · first recordedICANN
“EDCL2689T-T32016 · ECHO Domain Co L.L.C. · replacement string of .super”ICANN
“EDCL2689T-T94739 · ECHO Domain Co L.L.C. · replacement string of .agent · Deactivated XI2694T-T39173 · XRegistry Incorporated · replacement string of .xn--6oqv20b1zgzxr · Deactivated XI2694T-T41185 · XRegistry Incorporated · replacement string of .get · Deactivated”ICANN
- Band chosen: 10-29 (vanity/joke/narrow). .glam is a short, globally recognised English slang word tied to beauty, fashion and glamour, so it has genuine memorability and a plausible buyer group among influencers, salons, makeup artists and cosmetics marketing campaigns. It is not in the 30-49 band because, by analogy (flagged as analogy) with beauty-and-lifestyle strings already in market such as .beauty, .makeup, .hair and .style, demand in this space tends to be promotion-driven and campaign-oriented rather than sustained primary-identity use at volume, and a more literal descriptive competitor already sits on the category, leaving .glam as the second-choice, slangier option; specific registration counts for those analogues are unknown here. It is not in the 1-9 band because there is a real, identifiable use case and a recognisable word, which is more than a no-market string offers. The verified facts record one application from ECHO Domain Co L.L.C., filed as a replacement string for a primary application for .super, with zero contention on the record; a single uncontested applicant makes a straightforward path to market likely but says nothing about end-user pull. Main market uncertainty: whether beauty-industry brands and creator networks would treat .glam as a primary identity at all, or only as a short redirect or campaign address while keeping a .com as home; the score assumes the latter dominates over the next five years.