.get
Is .get a real TLD? Who’s applying to run it?
.get is contested: 2 applicants have said publicly that they applied to run it, as of 9 September 2026. They are ShortDot and Link Freedom Group.
Catchy for download links and promos, but the backwards word order keeps it from being a serious project's main address.
marketers, app publishers, and growth teams wanting short call-to-action redirect domains for downloads and promos, plus developers drawn to the HTTP-verb pun
In LFG's published list of 300+ strings submitted before the ICANN window closed on 2026-08-12. Their catalog tagline: “Cross it off, move ahead.”
One of the 80 strings ShortDot published for the ICANN 2026 round. ShortDot states it has submitted 40 applications, but publishes the 80 strings without revealing which 40 are applications and which 40 are designated replacements. The submission claim is therefore applicant-level, not string-level: nothing in the source says ShortDot applied for THIS string. Catalogued, not announced.
The 2012 applications making the most similar bet. Chosen by AI from every string in that round, without being told what happened to any of them.
Same bet: a one-syllable everyday English action verb sold as a call-to-action namespace where the value sits in the phrase (buy.x / get.x) rather than in any category meaning, so it only works if registrants adopt verb-phrase branding instead of noun-category branding.
Also a generic action verb pitched as an open retail CTA/short-link string whose whole thesis is cheap, memorable imperative phrasing for links and campaigns, not a vertical audience that would put its primary identity on it.
Same class of ultra-short, semantically empty English utility word bet on as a universal marketing/CTA modifier, though it is an adverb completing a phrase rather than a verb heading one, so the phrase-construction burden falls on the second-level differently.
What a .get domain is
.get is not a TLD yet. It is a string on our record of the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round, filed under Commerce. 2 applicants have said publicly that they applied for .get.
Is the .get domain extension real yet?
.get is not yet a domain extension you can register: nothing resolves under it, and no registrar sells names in it. It is a string applicants have put forward in the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round, the process that decides whether it becomes one.
When can you buy a .get domain?
You can’t yet. ICANN publishes every applied-for string on Reveal Day, 7 October 2026 at 18:00 UTC. A .get name can only be registered after that, once the string is delegated and its registry opens. Last round's closest parallel to .get was .buy, delegated on .
Is .get a real TLD?
Not yet. .get is not in the DNS root, so nothing resolves under it. It’s here because an applicant said publicly that it applied for .get in the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round. Every claim on this page links to its source.
- ShortDot · now announced
- ShortDot · first recordedShortDot (Ireland) Limited
- Link Freedom Group · first recordedLink Freedom Group
“ShortDot (Ireland) Limited has submitted 40 applications to ICANN's 2026 New gTLD Program. The 80 strings shown include applied-for and designated replacement strings across ShortDot's 40 ICANN applications, presented without revealing their status or pairing.”ShortDot (Ireland) Limited
“.get · Lifestyle · “Cross it off, move ahead.””Link Freedom Group
“The company just disclosed its 40 applications and 40 replacement strings.”Domain Name Wire
“LFG voluntarily published its full list of submissions ahead of ICANN’s official Reveal Day.”PR Newswire (Link Freedom Group)
“Top level domain registry Link Freedom Group (LFG) has disclosed more than 300 strings submitted as part of the ICANN new top level domain name program.”Domain Name Wire (Andrew Allemann)
- Band: usable but limited (30-49). The string is a short, universally understood English verb, which gives it genuine surface appeal for call-to-action uses: download pages, promo redirects, lead capture. The structural problem is word order: English puts the verb first, so 'shoes.get' reads backwards, and left-of-dot phrases fight the natural reading; by analogy (flagged as analogy), verb-right-of-dot TLDs in prior rounds have tended to settle into redirect and campaign duty rather than primary identities, and generic short-word TLDs sold on price have shown volume without brand signal or a deep aftermarket. There is a secondary developer-culture angle (the HTTP GET verb) that could drive hobby and tooling registrations, but that is analogy-based and historically shallow for similar puns. It is not in the 50-69 band because no category is visible where a .get address would be a defensible primary identity over the next 5 years rather than a pointer to a real site; it is above the 10-29 band because the word is common, unambiguous, and has recurring practical use in marketing funnels, which supports sustained if unglamorous demand. Applicant context: the applicant filed a very large portfolio in the round, which is stated neutrally; a portfolio-scale operator suggests price-driven volume positioning is plausible, consistent with the lower half of this band. Main market uncertainty: whether campaign/redirect demand from marketers is recurring and renewal-backed or one-off and churny, which decides whether this sits near the top or bottom of its band.