.auth

Is .auth a real TLD? Who’s applying to run it?

.auth is contested: 3 applications for it are on ICANN’s Reveal Day list, as of 7 October 2026. They are NextGEN TLDs, Codyssey and Link Freedom Group. XServer named .auth as a backup string for its .start application. ICANN deactivated it, because another applicant applied for the same string or named it as a backup. Verisign named .auth as a backup string for its .pki application. ICANN deactivated it, because another applicant applied for the same string or named it as a backup. Suffix named .auth as a backup string for its .btw application. ICANN deactivated it, because another applicant applied for the same string or named it as a backup.

Generic applications · AI & tech · on the record since Aug 15, 2026, updated Oct 7, 2026
applicants
3 applications · 3 deactivated backups

Who is applying, and what they run today

None of the three runs a TLD today.

  • Codyssey SL

    Codyssey

    runs no TLD today

    backup .login, disallowed

  • Link Freedom Group Ltd

    Link Freedom Group

    controlled by Vandelay Investments Ltd, Yonatan Belousov

    runs no TLD today

    backup .mate

  • NextGEN TLDs GmbH

    NextGEN TLDs

    controlled by Philipp Grabensee, Roland LaPlante

    runs no TLD today

    backup .park, disallowed

runs TLDs today; the larger, the more namesruns none.tld in orange: one of this string’s closest 2012 stringsbackup .x usable · backup .x ✕ disallowed

Applications are counted by company, across its legal entities, from ICANN’s list. Names are from the registries’ June 2026 reports to ICANN. “None on record” means no public source in our record ties the company to a registry operator that runs TLDs today. Control: each application’s own answer to ICANN (question 108). Largest TLDs and names: the registries’ monthly reports to ICANN.

backups
  • SuffixDeactivated backupsuffix.domains ↗

    Named on the ICANN gTLD application list, 7 October 2026 as a replacement (backup) string of the applicant's .btw application, shown as deactivated: another applicant applied for the same string or named it as a backup

    Deactivated backup for .btwGenericICANN SI2639T-T50366ICANN ↗
  • VerisignDeactivated backupverisign.com ↗

    Named on the ICANN gTLD application list, 7 October 2026 as a replacement (backup) string of the applicant's .pki application, shown as deactivated: another applicant applied for the same string or named it as a backup

    Deactivated backup for .pkiGenericICANN VRSN2658T-T77256ICANN ↗
  • XServerDeactivated backupxserver.co.jp ↗

    Named on the ICANN gTLD application list, 7 October 2026 as a replacement (backup) string of the applicant's .start application, shown as deactivated: another applicant applied for the same string or named it as a backup

    Deactivated backup for .startGenericICANN XI2694T-T96618ICANN ↗

Will names sell?

◈AI score
47/ 100
Usable but limited

A natural fit for login and identity tech brands, but narrow demand and phishing worries keep it a niche developer address.

assessed by claude-fable-5 · Aug 15, 2026

Last round the AI scored the 2012 strings blind to their fate. Strings it scored 60 or more hold a median 27,168 names today; those under 30, a median of 30. .auth’s closest 2012 strings hold .secure 2, .security 931 and .dev 713K.

AI score 47 of 100. .com scores 96, .ai scores 84.

For comparison, .com scores 96 and .ai scores 84 on the same rubric.

How the AI’s blind 2012 read held up: its score of each 2012 string against the names it holds today808 2012-round TLDs. Scored 60 or more: median 27168 names. Scored under 30: median 30 names. .auth's closest 2012 strings: .secure scored 55, 2 names; .security scored 56, 931 names; .dev scored 55, 712600 names.101001K10K100K1M020406080100scored 60+: median 27Kunder 30: median 30.secure · 55 · 2.security · 56 · 931.dev · 55 · 713Kthe AI’s blind 2012 score of each string (its own scale) →names held today (log) →

a 2012-round TLD.auth’s closest 2012 strings: score · names

The 2012 read is a separate, time-locked score on its own scale, so .auth’s score above is not placed on it. Names: the registries’ reports to ICANN, 2026-10. Non-brand 2012 TLDs in the root.

closest 2012 strings
3 of 1,408

The nearest 2012 strings, and how many names each holds today

The closest 2012 string, .secure, held 2 names, June 2026. .security held 931; .dev held 712,600. Chosen by AI from every string in the 2012 round, without being told what happened to any of them.

  1. .securestrong parallel2 names, June 2026live since 2016 · 2 applications in 2012 · scored 55* in 2012 · Amazon EU S.à r.l.See .secure in Stats

    Same bet as .auth: a short, un-ownable trust-function word that no single vendor can claim but every security/identity provider wants, whose value depends entirely on the registry policing who is allowed to stand behind it.

  2. .securitystrong parallel931 names, June 2026live since 2015 · 3 applications in 2012 · scored 56* in 2012 · Symantec CorporationSee .security in Stats

    The category-noun form of the same wager — a functional trust word sold to the same buyer set (security and identity vendors putting primary product identity on it), differing from .auth only in being the industry label rather than the technical function.

  3. .devmoderate712,600 names, June 2026live since 2014 · 2 applications in 2012 · scored 55* in 2012 · Charleston Road Registry Inc.See .dev in Stats

    Closest structural match for the clipped-developer-jargon shape: an abbreviation developers already type daily, bet on developer-infrastructure companies and their tooling namespaces rather than on a consumer audience, which is where .auth's actual registrants (identity/SDK vendors) live.

Names are from the registries’ monthly reports to ICANN. Each name opens the TLD’s stats page: how it grew, who sells it, and the 2026 strings compared with it. * A separate 2012-only read, time-locked to what was public that year, on a different scale from this page’s score.

Where they meet elsewhere

XServer and Link Freedom Group face each other in 8 contests this round, .auth included.

  • Link Freedom Group × XServer
    8
  • Link Freedom Group × Suffix
    7
  • Link Freedom Group × NextGEN TLDs
    7
  • XServer × Suffix
    1
  • Suffix × NextGEN TLDs
    1

Shared contests: strings where both companies hold an application on ICANN’s list. Companies that meet another here in fewer than three are left out.

who it’s for

identity and access-management vendors, developer-tool startups building login/SSO/passkey products, and security teams wanting a semantic home for authentication endpoints

What a .auth domain is

.auth is not a TLD yet. It is a string on our record of the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round, in our AI & tech category. 3 applications for it are on ICANN’s Reveal Day list.

Is the .auth domain extension real yet?

.auth is not yet a domain extension you can register: nothing resolves under it, and no registrar sells names in it. It is a string applicants have put forward in the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round, the process that decides whether it becomes one.

When can you buy a .auth domain?

You can’t yet. A .auth name can only be registered once the string is delegated (added to the DNS root) and its registry opens. Last round's closest parallel to .auth was .secure, delegated on 10 August 2016.

Is .auth a real TLD?

Not yet. .auth is not in the DNS root, so nothing resolves under it. It’s here because .auth is on ICANN’s Reveal Day list of applied-for strings. Every entry on this page links to its source.

Considering a name on .auth?Appraise a name on this TLD →

This record is corrected in the open. See the changelog and methodology.